Skip to main content

Worrying Developments between Poland and Russia

If you read nothing else of the article below, know this. Russia spends 7 times more today than it did 5 years ago on military procurement and modernisation. Russia has also recently deployed several batteries of S-300 missiles near Poland's border and has warned Poland not to allow the missile defence system to be set up on her soil. Things are heating up between Central Europe and Russia and almost no one is noticing.
WARSAW -- The U.S. proposal to place radar and interceptor sites for a new missile defence system in Central Europe -- respectively, in the Czech Republic and Poland -- may generate a new security partnership with the countries of the region. Or it could provoke a spiral of misunderstanding, weaken NATO, deepen Russian paranoia and cost the United States some of its last friends on the continent.


Early omens are worrisome. Some genius at the State Department or the Pentagon sent the first official note describing possible placement of the facility with a draft reply attached -- a reply that contained a long list of host countries' obligations and few corresponding U.S. commitments. Natives here tend to think they are capable of writing their own diplomatic correspondence. But in a region where goodwill toward the United States depends on the memory of its support in resisting Soviet colonialism, this was particularly crass. If the Bush administration expects Poles and Czechs to jump for joy and agree to whatever is proposed, it's going to face a mighty crash with reality.

The administration might have gotten away with this five years ago, when the memory of Ronald Reagan's steadfast support for our freedom fighters had just been bolstered by American advocacy of NATO enlargement, despite Russian hostility and some hesitation among Western European nations. But the war in Iraq has dented Central European trust. The spectacle of the U.S. secretary of state at the U.N. Security Council solemnly presenting intelligence that proved unreliable shook our faith. Our old-fashioned expectation that the United States would show gratitude for our participation in Iraq also proved misplaced. Public perceptions of America are plummeting, while opposition to U.S.-led military operations, and above all to the proposed missile site, grows. We have decided that the United States is a foreign country after all.

Meanwhile, membership in the European Union has reoriented our foreign and domestic policies. Few in the United States realize that Poland, to name one example, is receiving $120 billion to upgrade its infrastructure and agriculture under the current seven-year E.U. budget. By comparison, American military assistance to Poland amounts to $30 million annually, a fraction of what we spend on missions in Iraq and Afghanistan that we regard as acts of friendship toward the United States. Perhaps the best illustration of the changing dynamic is the fact that the visa issue that once vexed Polish politicians -- Americans come to Poland without visas, while Poles need them to enter America -- has lost its urgency. There are a lot more proverbial Polish plumbers working legally in Britain and Ireland than illegally in Chicago.

While U.S. influence and esteem have diminished, strategic stakes in the region are rising. Awash with oil money, Russia spends seven times more on procurement and modernization of military equipment than it did just five years ago. Russia recently deployed several batteries of S-300 missiles near our border -- the first such provocation toward NATO in 20 years -- yet this elicited not a squeak of protest from the alliance. Russia is also threatening to deploy scores of intermediate missiles aimed at Warsaw in response to the missile defense base, a threat no Polish politician can ignore.

Our American colleagues say not to worry, that NATO will protect us, but rhetorical assurances are too easy. Just as the Holocaust is the formative experience even for Jews who are too young to remember it, so Poland is haunted by the memory of fighting Hitler alone in 1939 while our allies stood by. Never again will we allow ourselves to be egged on by paper guarantees not backed by practical means of delivery. Therefore, if relations with Russia are to deteriorate because of the proposed missile base, the United States must demonstrate that it will do for Poland what it is doing for Japan in the face of its confrontation with North Korea: tightening formal security arrangements and deploying batteries of Patriot missiles or the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system. Placing the main operating base of allied ground surveillance in Central Europe would also reassure the region that its countries are truly NATO territory. Finally, the United States should tell NATO how it intends to include the Central European base in the alliance's missile defense architecture. Otherwise, we will suspect that America, having protected itself, will not devote further resources to a NATO system.

The worst outcome would be for the Czech and Polish governments to yield to diplomatic arm-twisting only for the agreements to fail in our famously independent parliaments. Such a scenario would repeat the crisis in U.S.-Turkish relations over the transit of American forces to Iraq in 2003, which has never been resolved. To forestall such an outcome, the United States needs to once again see the world through the eyes of its allies and offer them a partnership that enhances the security of both.

Radek Sikorski, a senator in Poland's Parliament, was secretary of defense from October 2005 to February 2007.


Related Link: Washington Post - Don't take Poland for granted

Comments

  1. If Poland needs allies they can count on when the chips are down, they only need to look back to history to see how much their friends helped.

    If I were Poland, I'd be very worried.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Poland, land of fine cavalry and crappy geography.

    You couldn't found somewhere to live other than BETWEEN Russia and Germany?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Murray, yeah, well, living on an island would have been the smart thing to do. Don't need too much of a military to defend against anyone. Except when the Vikings attack, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Didn't you get the memo? Turns out that the Vikings were not violent at all, they were just harmless explorers, traders and farmers who settled new lands... with extreme prejudice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's a couple of things that concern me about the article.

    The first is the writer has a point, and the US would do well to keep good allies in the new democracies on side.

    But the other issue is that Poland looks to be creeping towards Old Europe mode.

    The fertility rate is 1.25 per woman.. disastrous and suicidal to go with the exodus of the much talked about Polish Plumber.

    The defence budget is just 1.7% of GDP. That compares to Finland at 2%, Germany, 1.5%, France 2.5%, Czech Republic 1.8%, Norway 1.9% and Sweden at 1.5%.

    Being closer to Norway, Sweden and Germany than Finland or France in defence spending looks like defence bludging. The somewhat whiny tone of the article that the US should do more for Polands defence suggests, along with the birthrate, defence budget and emigration, that Poland is catching the European Disease of Socialism, the corruption of subsidies, culture suicide and anti-Americanism.

    JC

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please be respectful. Foul language and personal attacks may get your comment deleted without warning. Contact us if your comment doesn't appear - the spam filter may have grabbed it.